TSSP Procedures: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>fill channel</td> | <td>fill channel (store/copy)</td> | ||
<td align=center>3</td> | <td align=center>3</td> | ||
<td align=center>T</td> | <td align=center>T</td> | ||
Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>reserve channel</td> | <td>reserve channel (alloc)</td> | ||
<td align=center>2</td> | <td align=center>2</td> | ||
<td align=center>T</td> | <td align=center>T</td> | ||
Line 137: | Line 137: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>consume content</td> | <td>consume content (load)</td> | ||
<td align=center>1</td> | <td align=center>1</td> | ||
<td align=center>T</td> | <td align=center>T</td> |
Revision as of 09:57, 3 January 2008
This section contains recommendations pertaining to the Issues section of the TSSP Framework article.
(back to Protocol Standardization Efforts)
Fault Tolerance
The steps that compose the five proposed standard operations are shown ranked by how many times they appear in the operations' construction. Also, each step is categorized as being able, or desired, to be implemented in parallel. Steps that support parallelism assume that the failure of one of the executing threads compromises the entire operation, triggering aggressive rollback when possible. Inability to rollback can result in several undesired states:
- Inaccessible channel capacity
- Inaccessible channel content
- Skewed channel duration
- Skewed channel capacity
Step | Occurrence | Parallel (T/F) | Failure Type | Procedure |
---|---|---|---|---|
obtain metadata | 5 | F |
|
|
fill channel (store/copy) | 3 | T | - | - |
obtain depot set | 2 | T |
|
|
determine next depot | 2 | F |
|
|
reserve channel (alloc) | 2 | T | - | - |
publish/record metadata | 2 | F |
|
|
order depot set | 1 | F |
|
|
expire channel | 1 | T | - | - |
consume content (load) | 1 | T | - | - |
channel duration | 1 | T | - | - |
channel capacity | 1 | T | - | - |