Exnode specification: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
[[Simple schema]] | [[Simple schema]] | ||
*The schema shows that only the element mapping has much structure. | |||
The schema shows that only the element mapping has much structure. | *The element metadata's use of attributes is completely open. | ||
The element metadata's use of attributes is completely open. | *The only re-used type is the IBP_capability (read,write,manage) |
Revision as of 19:21, 16 January 2008
The exnode specification is implied by current usage in L-Store and LoRS.
exnodes and erasure codings.
- L-Store writes extra erasure allocations.
- These allocations are also stored in the exnode file
- These allocations are only useful to a data-rebuilder not the data user
- L-Store can write a LoRS compatible exnode file that excludes the erasure allocations.
- LoRS compatibility
- LoRS does not have access to L-Store's capability to regain a file.
Is this OK?
- The data user does not need (and probably should not be bothered with) to handle error recovery.
- data recovery, data warming, etc all are done by services/agents apart from the data consumer.
- So what user interface and development API are needed by the data users?
- command line tools
- file movement
- file system (some use the term namespace management) tools
- list files, create directories, etc
- C/C++ API
- just need my simple offsets and lengths
- would like to read a vector of data blocks (non-blocked reads)
- don't want to deal with erasure stuff at this point.
- is there a nice way to recover from errors?
The exnode xml is fairly unstructured and the functionality of a schema is minimal.
Possible XML schema:
Simplified xml file (remove xmlns to see/understand structure more clearly)
- The schema shows that only the element mapping has much structure.
- The element metadata's use of attributes is completely open.
- The only re-used type is the IBP_capability (read,write,manage)